<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jase Miller &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasemiller.com/notebook/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasemiller.com/notebook</link>
	<description>poetry + design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>An Idea for closing the Facebook/Twitter loop</title>
		<link>http://jasemiller.com/notebook/2010/08/an-idea-for-closing-the-facebooktwitter-loop/</link>
		<comments>http://jasemiller.com/notebook/2010/08/an-idea-for-closing-the-facebooktwitter-loop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jase</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasemiller.com/notebook/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite my enjoyment of Twitter, my friends on Facebook tend to prefer Facebook to Twitter, so unless I am exceedingly intentional about trawling Facebook I miss a lot of what is happening there. Facebook and Twitter are often grouped in the same networking genre (rightly so, I believe), but they are also extremely unique rather than redundant social networking tools. I think pitting them against one another is a pointless exercise. It seems there are good ways to automatically post from Twitter to Facebook, but how can we close the loop in the other direction?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an idea that I&#8217;m freely pitching out there for anyone who wants to attempt to solve what I consider a major communication problem in social networking. <em>By the way, if you know of a solution that already exists please comment below</em>.</p>
<p>I enjoy everything (well, nearly) about Twitter. It is my preferred social media tool. Facebook, however, boasts a much more robust networking environment which I consider to be quite valuable. I like keeping up with old and new friends, learning more about the people I know, reconnecting with more distant family members and so forth. I have for awhile been integrating my Twitter and Facebook status updates by configuring my Twitter client to automatically post tweets to Facebook as status updates. As far as I&#8217;m concerned this works wonderfully.</p>
<p><strong>Problem</strong>:  Despite my enjoyment of Twitter, my friends on Facebook tend to prefer Facebook to Twitter, so unless I am exceedingly intentional about trawling Facebook I miss a lot of what is happening there. Facebook and Twitter are often grouped in the same networking genre (rightly so, I believe), but they are also extremely unique rather than redundant social networking tools. I think pitting them against one another is a pointless exercise. It seems there are good ways to automatically post from Twitter to Facebook, but how can we close the loop in the other direction?</p>
<p><strong>Proposed solution</strong>:  A framework that would close the loop on communications by automatically creating a Twitter account (or using an existing one) for every Facebook user. By default, all Facebook friends would become followers on Twitter. All Facebook status updates could then be pushed to Twitter as well.</p>
<p><strong>Discussion</strong>:  (<em>please post your thoughts as comments, but here&#8217;s a primer</em>&#8230;) Privacy could be further compromised for some users who intend only their Facebook friends to see their status updates. However, Facebook is already trying to make status updates highly public, even if users don&#8217;t realize it. Could the proposed framework create &#8220;protected&#8221; Twitter accounts by default, so there are essentially smaller, limited access networks sharing posts on Twitter via Facebook, or would this lead to other problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jasemiller.com/notebook/2010/08/an-idea-for-closing-the-facebooktwitter-loop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IntenseDebate is back</title>
		<link>http://jasemiller.com/notebook/2009/11/intensedebate-is-back/</link>
		<comments>http://jasemiller.com/notebook/2009/11/intensedebate-is-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jase</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasemiller.com/notebook/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I continue to be impressed with IntenseDebate and the Automatticians at Automattic. <a href="http://twitter.com/MKoenig" target="_blank">Michael Koenig</a>, kung fu support specialist for ID, responded proactively to a comment I made on Twitter encouraging me to email him about the issue. He and the team at ID (I assume there were others involved) made quick work of it and restored my ability to approve the comments that went missing. Further, I was impressed with...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I continue to be impressed with <a title="Sign up for an IntenseDebate account!" href="http://intensedebate.com" target="_blank">IntenseDebate</a> and the Automatticians at Automattic. <a title="Michael Koenig on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/MKoenig" target="_blank">Michael Koenig</a>, kung fu support specialist for ID, responded proactively to a comment I made on Twitter encouraging me to email him about the issue. He and the team at ID (I assume there were others involved) made quick work of it and restored my ability to approve the comments that went missing. Further, I was impressed with their customer service responses in age that has largely lost hold of the concept of service. Kudos to ID! I continue to be excited about their offerings.</p>
<p>In addition to that, they responded favourably regarding a feature suggestion and it turns out something like it is already in the works&#8230; though it is top secret at the moment. I have some guesses about what the new functionality might be, but even if I&#8217;m only partly right, I&#8217;m excited about ID&#8217;s future and how the blogosphere could become an even better place to be with their help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jasemiller.com/notebook/2009/11/intensedebate-is-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
